Critical Review Assignment Help.
The primary aim of this assessment is to get you to think about what you read, and about how you respond to what you read. Critical reading is an academic skill that you will develop and practice throughout your academic career. In this task, you will demonstrate your critical reading skills by writing a critical review of ONE of the course readings for weeks 1-4. A critical review summarises what the work is about and analyses and evaluates what the writer has to say. In order to write a critical review, you must first be able to read critically so there are two parts to this task:
(a) Critical reading check list (10%): this will involve you using a check list that will help take you through the sorts of things you will need to include in your critical review.
Not all of the check list will necessarily be relevant to the article you have chosen to review but you will be assessed on how effectively you have used the checklist to support your understanding of the article. Your completed checklist will be submitted with your critical review
(b) Critical review (15%): your review will have an introduction, body and conclusion. In your introduction, you will explain the context, purpose and main idea of the article. In the body of your review, you will analyse and evaluate the article, and in your conclusion, you will briefly summarise your discussion and assess the value of the article. You will be provided with exemplars and a writing guide. Word limit: 800 word max =/- 10%
Critical Review Assignment Help.
McNamara’s article Hyper-criminalisation discusses the overturning of behaviors or people into crime scenes. From the article, it is clear that there have been developments of behaviors and crimes changed into other new casts, with the essence of promoting relevant legal systems to be used within a specific period. Besides, there is a justification of the parameters of criminal laws and thus, the severity of the sanctions. No limitations are considered for the bikies of the demons that make up the legal systems or justice platforms. Essentially, this article analyses the origins and existence of hyper-criminalization, through the assessment of processes to hyper-criminalization.
Evaluation of Primary Argument and the Claims of the Media
McNamara gives an argument that all the good individuals at one point in life, are exposed to risks that lead to committing crimes. The claim that most of the perpetrators of crimes are always innocent people. In addition, the resulting legal policies are not frequently limited within their performances or operations, and as such, the specific instrumental elements affect the entire society through the legal systems. These laws apply to several members of the community and as such, should clearly be stated and articulated within a different timeframe of design. The crimes may overextend to the justifiable and would, therefore, be over doing and practicing of evil, frequently termed as overcriminalisation. The article compares the over-criminalization with the role and responsibility of the media platform, which forms a portion of the moral panic implementation of laws that are driven by the policies and regulations instilled in different individuals. Some of the laws should be implemented and redirected to the places that are lawless; a decision that would require the media and the government to be made. Also, drive by shootings that took place in Western Sydney has had the media in the limelight, an effective action that directly influences the surroundings within the specific period. The legal systems were described as the gang related models from the same platform.
Evaluation of Claims for Politicians
The duties of politicians in this article are affirmed as one that prompts the necessary steps of developing stability within a specified country. With the analysis of the roles of the politicians from McNamara’s article, it is certain that the bikies are drawn from the main political arena. The demonization of laws introduces the significance of different politicians within a certain framework and particular period.
Evaluation of Claims of Police
The police play an indispensable role in the demonization of laws and regulations within a society. From the lawless society to the implementation of policies within the states that had been mobilized, demonization of laws is one of the major issues occurring within the society today. Even with the affordability of awareness that is created within a certain state, there is a need for sensitization of citizens.
Summary of Argument
From the above annotations, it is clear that through the amendments of new laws, the new crimes can easily be curbed in the society, with a basic understanding of the operation of different systems of governance. Besides, the media and the police help with merging of information that may be influential within a particular period, and a certain reinforcement on the citizens. At some point, the laws are broken and become more demonized by seeking flexibility within a certain parameter, based on the timeline or period that is incited and explored.
Overall Evaluation; Assessment of Claims, Evidence, Rhetorical Styles and Assumptions
According to McNamara (2016), the major argument is the bike effect or influence of evils to different legal systems and policies. To some extent, there might be an existence or thought of drafting the draconian law, which might be effective in regulating the basic actions of people. The evidence from the demonization of laws is affirmed from the media coverage of crimes that have the attributes, which are new. The claim is the relationship between criminalization that considers demonization as a short-term solution, and on the other hand, the long-term solution would be a law-making process. The evidence is through the practice of amendments of law from the political systems and coverage by the media.
Discussion of Broader Issues
When analysis broader issue, finding solutions to criminalization is articulated on a balance of scale through demonization.
Links between the Authors’ Main Argument and the Context
The author is trying to drive home the act of tolerance through amending the laws and at the same time, considering different case studies, especially in the past. From the same knowledge, having a clear balance that would proclaim a specific individual to have broken the law helps with the validation of different processes that have been created. Even with the demonization influence, the legal systems still need enhancement, which is best affirmed from the legal balance and awareness on different occasions and specific period.
McNamara, L., & Quilter, J. (2016). The ‘bikie effect’ and other forms of demonisation: The origins and effects of hyper-criminalisation. Law in Context, 34(2), 5.