Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay
Instructions:-
Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation.
As the country focuses on the restructuring of the U.S. health care delivery system, nurses will continue to play an important role. It is expected that more and more nursing jobs will become available out in the community, and fewer will be available in acute care hospitals.
1 Write an informal presentation (500-700 words) to educate nurses about how the practice of nursing is expected to grow and change. Include the concepts of continuity or continuum of care, accountable care organizations (ACO), medical homes, and nurse-managed health clinics.
2 Share your presentation with nurse colleagues on your unit or department and ask them to offer their impressions of the anticipated changes to health care delivery and the new role of nurses in hospital settings, communities, clinics, and medical homes.
3 In 800-1,000 words summarize the feedback shared by three nurse colleagues and discuss whether their impressions are consistent with what you have researched about health reform.
4 A minimum of three scholarly references are required for this assignment.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Solution
Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay
Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation.
Sherry Ginn is psychology teacher at Rowan-Cabarrus Community College in North Carolina. She is also a famous author and editor of books on matters women, her topics range from sex to time travel in science fiction television, and has been involved in the creation the critically acclaimed series Farscape and Fringe. One of Ginns most read works is her critique on Mary Shelley’s revolutionary novel, Frankenstein. In her essay, Frankenstein: Science, Science Fiction, or Autobiography? Ginn not only explores the possibility that Frankenstein might be Mary Shelley’s autobiography but also the deeper themes of the science behind the motifs in the novel.
When thinking about science fiction, futuristic ideas pop in minds such as intergalactic travel, post-modern technology or extraterrestrial life. But where did the science fiction genre originate? One of the first science fiction novels was written in 1818. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley has widely seen the matriarch of science fiction. Sherry Ginn employ’s her expertise and extensive knowledge in literature to analyze Frankenstein.
Ginn explores the possibilities of the novel Frankenstein being an autobiography, scientific or science fiction. Ginn has gathered research from vast sources to prop her claims. Her essay, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Science, Science Fiction, or Autobiography? Manages to convince the readers that Frankenstein can be categorized as a work of the ongoing theme of the creating life such as when Victor researchers on life and death at the University of Ingolstadt. As with her other works, Ginn deeply researched on the attributes of science fiction. Ginn points out Mellor’s classification of science fiction which state, 1) is grounded in valid scientific research (2) predicts what might be possible in the future given new scientific discoveries and, (3) offers a humanistic critique of either particular technological inventions or the very nature of scientific thinking (Ginn, Sherry)
In building up her thesis, Ginn cites Erik Erikson’s seminal works on personality development. Eriksen proposed that an individual’s personality develops from childhood in 8 stages, with each stage occurring due to the demands imposed on the person by their environment. Resolving the conflict at each stage propels the individual towards growth and hence the next stage which also come with greater vulnerability (Ginn, Sherry). Eriksen’s model comprises the following steps; Hope, Basic trust vs. fundamental mistrust, Will, Autonomy vs. Shame, Purpose, Initiative vs. Guilt, Competence, Industry vs. Inferiority, Fidelity, Identity vs. Role Confusion, Love, Intimacy vs. isolation, Care, Generativity vs. stagnation and Wisdom, Ego integrity vs. despair. Ginn traces Shelley’s life from childhood well into old age while paralleling the influences her life might have had on her novel, Frankenstein. The plot surprisingly follows Eriksen’s model almost faithfully further confirming Ginn’s asserting that Frankenstein is scientific. Ginn’s essay manages to sway the reader to her view by the apt evidence she presents through.
Prof. Naomi Hetherington’s essay on the same novel, Creator and Created in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein explores a different take altogether. Hetherington is convinced that Frankenstein themes are focused on the condition of man Vis a Vis to the nature of God as well as humanity’s quest to not only understand but attain it (Hetherington, Naomi). This view is not so far from Prof. Ginn’s assertions, and thus the two views can easily be harmonized.
Sources Cited
Ginn, Sherry. “Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein: Science, Science Fiction, Or Autobiography?”. Clas.Ufl.Edu, 1990, http://www.clas.ufl.edu/ipsa/2003/ginn.html.
Hetherington, Naomi. “Hetherington, “Creator And Created In Frankenstein””. Knarf.English.Upenn.Edu, 1997, http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/hether.html.
