My Worldview Inventory
Instructions:-
Write an 800-1,000 word essay on your personal worldview. Briefly discuss the various possible meanings of the term “spirituality,” and your understanding of the concepts of pluralism, scientism, and postmodernism. Primarily, address the following seven basic worldview questions:
What is prime reality?
What is the nature of the world around you?
What is a human being?
What happens to a person at death?
Why is it possible to know anything at all?
How do people know what is right or wrong?
What is the meaning of human history?
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Assignment
Week 1 | Worldview Foundations of Spirituality an…CurrentAll
Save Link Assignment Personal Worldview Inventory
View Rubric
Due Date: Feb 05, 2017 23:59:59 Max Points: 100
Details:
Write an 800-1,000 word essay on your personal worldview. Briefly discuss the various possible meanings of the term “spirituality,” and your understanding of the concepts of pluralism, scientism, and postmodernism. Primarily, address the following seven basic worldview questions:
What is prime reality?
What is the nature of the world around you?
What is a human being?
What happens to a person at death?
Why is it possible to know anything at all?
How do people know what is right or wrong?
What is the meaning of human history?
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents
Apply Rubrics
Personal Worldview Inventory
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 %Comprehension of Pertinent Terms
The concept of spirituality is not analyzed clearly, and no distinctions are made among possible meanings of the term. Only one meaning for the term spirituality is assumed. There is no discussion or discernible grasp of the concepts of pluralism, scientism, and postmodernism.
There is surface coverage of the concept of spirituality, with some distinctions, but demonstrating poor or unclear grasp of these distinctions. There is a poor grasp and application of scientism and postmodernism to the concept of spirituality.
At least two senses of spirituality are distinguished, though the grasp of that distinction may be shallow. Grasp of scientism and postmodernism is limited to its definition, with some demonstration that its full application and significance is grasped, even if minimally.
At least two senses of spirituality, including from the text, are distinguished. Description of how spirituality is broadly defined in the context of scientism and postmodernism is provided and sufficiently demonstrates a grasp of the meaning of these concepts.
Several possible definitions of the term spirituality, including from the text, are clearly articulated and distinguished. Description of how spirituality is broadly defined in the context of scientism and postmodernism is provided and clearly demonstrates a grasp of the meaning of these concepts.
45.0 %Personal Worldview Analysis
The analysis does not answer all seven questions and there is no discussion of the interconnection of the questions and their implications.
The analysis answers all seven questions but with minimal thought and any attempt at interconnection of the questions has little to no relevance.
The analysis answers all seven questions thoughtfully and in a detailed manner. The analysis hints at the interconnection of the questions and their implications.
The analysis answers all seven questions thoughtfully and in a detailed manner. The analysis recognizes the interconnection of the questions and their implications.
The analysis answers all seven questions thoughtfully and in a detailed manner. The analysis thoroughly explains the interconnection of the questions and their implications.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
Solution
My Worldview Inventory
According to Moorman (2015), “worldview” articulates to the central basis of reality that entails the assumptions, categories, and values, that is shared by various communities or cultures, in which people view the world from multiple perspectives. Each and every person tend to view the world from a different point of view; I am no exception. Nevertheless, a group of individuals such as a family or a community can have a similar worldview. This paper transcends an inventory of my personal worldview as well as reviews my understanding of spirituality, pluralism, scientism, and postmodernism.
First, spirituality entails a series of activities where individuals seek the true meaning of a sacred being, rather an experience of one’s inner dimension. It is a proven fact that spirituality has an effect on the worldview of individuals, as such; it is a crucial component to consider holistically in the intervention process as a healthcare professional (Pullen, McGuire, Farmer, & Dodd, 2015). Hindrances to spirituality have been derived from the packed functions of medical care in that these hindrances are imitative from the theoretical concepts of postmodernism and scientism. From my personal perspective, I believe that my faith has an impact on my worldview as a Christian despite the fact that I have a rich background and expertise in science. Furthermore, my background in science shows the capability for a pluralistic association.
In an analysis of spirituality, it is imperative to note that it involves an individual perception of the beliefs and norms that relate to their connection with the meaning of life as well as others in a broad-spectrum. Spirituality primarily recoils itself to the various forms, though this research does not dwell merely on the religious impact, rather it purports that spirituality as an essential and efficient holistic intervention as well as treatment of a patient. Over time, religion and spirituality have been neglected in the medical field since the spirituality of patients and history are not considered in the conversations. For better treatment and intervention process, spiritual aspects are vital as they have unwavering influences on the worldview of some patients in context. Puchalski (2013) postulates that spirituality is actively associated with the improved adaptation skills, decreased mortality rates, and increase in patient recovery.
Spirituality has been immune from the medical field as a result of the philosophical concepts of postmodernism and scientism. Nevertheless, Sorell (2013) accounts that the philosophical thought of scientism articulates that if knowledge of a given aspect was not acquired since then, the knowledge is viewed as vague and fallacious. Alternatively, Bresler (2013) suggests that postmodernism focusses on the significance of communication, power relationships, and personalization in the configuration of truth and worldviews. Proponents of postmodernism have a belief that the reality does not exist, as such, they phrase it as “ethical values or morals.” This analogy keeps away the role of complete understanding, reason, and the sagacity of science. Therefore these philosophical thoughts subdue spirituality as they refute pluralism. Kirschner (2006) suggests that pluralism is the mobile reception or acceptance of diversity in beliefs and practices. Hence, the two concepts have undermined the ethical reasoning in humans. I accept as true that a fraction of the these philosophical thoughts can interrelate to activate the spirituality of a patient as well as contribute wholly on their worldview. For example, accepting the vitality of the role of science or spirituality in healthcare.
Sire (2009) formulates seven questions that an individual can use to evaluate their worldview. First, he asks “What is real in the world?” as a definition of prime reality. My prime reality entails that I truly believe in God and his existence. Second, he asks individuals on how they recognize the temperament of the world around them. I reply to this, as a Christian, I believe in the biblical creation stories that God created man, the universe, heavens, and earth. Also, as a nurse practitioner, I believe in the evolution theory. Third, Sire asks individuals to define a human being. I hold a belief that human being is God’s image. From the dynamics of evolution, I can assert that man came from apes. Additionally, I stand to agree that people are unique, complex and living creatures who breathe and are emotional as well as capable of doing good or evil. Fourth, Sire asks individuals of their perceptions on what happens to individuals after death. My Christian faith influences me in a way to believe that there is life after death. Additionally, I consider that people will be judged for their wrongdoings or sins to determine whether their souls will go to heaven or hell. Also, I reflect in the existence of eternal peace after death. Furthermore, I assert that the life on earth is an evaluation of having a peaceful afterlife.
Sire continues asking if one can know it all. In response to this query, I have a belief that it is individual must be contented and expected to know what they have discovered since as a Christian I know that God is all-knowing and he has given the man an opportunity to figure out the the unkonwn in life. Another critical question that Sire outlines are entails whether one can distinguish right from wrong. Being a Christian, the Bible teaches us that on what is considered right or wrong, sin or evil. Lastly, Sire tries to know how a person can determine his worldview by asking, “What is human history?” I can approach this question and say that “human history” is a test process, the way one carries out activities ever since they were born until they die.
I am a proponent of pluralism since my worldview lies
between the scientific and Christian perspectives. As such, pluralism must be
practiced in healthcare to promote subsistence of spirituality and science in a
broad concept. Healthcare professionals must treat a patient holistically for
better treatment outcomes since some research suggest that a consideration of
spirituality has demonstrated significant effects on the healing process.
References
Bresler, L. (Ed.). (2013). Knowing Bodies, Moving Minds: Towards Embodied Teaching and Learning (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Kirschner, S. R. (2006). Psychology and Pluralism: Towards the Psychological Studies. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 1, 26(1-20).
Moorman, S. (2015). Nursing from a Christian Worldview: Being Transformed to Care. Journal of Christian Nursing, 31(1), E1-E7.
Puchalski, C. M. (2013). The Critical Need for Spirituality in Our Healthcare System. New Theology Review, 14(4).
Pullen, L., McGuire, S., Farmer, L., & Dodd, D. (2015). The relevance of spirituality to nursing practice and education: Many nurses are not confident about addressing this aspect of care, yet the spiritual needs of patients have a fundamental role in nursing and recovery, state Lisa Pullen and colleagues. Mental Health Practice, 18(5), 14-18. doi:10.7748/mhp.18.5.14.e916
Sire, J. W. (2009). The Universe Next Door: A Basic Worldview Catalog. InterVarsity Press.
Sorell, T. (2013). Scientism: Philosophy and The Infatuation with Science. Routledge.
